From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 1 22:06:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6224616A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:06:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8B843D4C for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:06:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id 6C7555C7B1; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:06:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:06:37 -0800 From: Bill Fumerola To: fbsd_user Message-ID: <20040102060637.GO82802@elvis.mu.org> References: <200401011940.i01JeBhr076478@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401011940.i01JeBhr076478@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-MUORG-20031210 i386 cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/60790: IPFW loadable module is useless as released X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 06:06:38 -0000 On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:40:11AM -0800, fbsd_user wrote: > You must have miss-read the problem description. unlikely. > The ipfw loadable module is useless as it's currently distributed > with the FBSD operation system software. you're going to have to back this conjecture up with a fact or two. > You need to correctly compile it with all the options and make it > part of the new 5.2 version of FBSD > when you release the next stable production 5.2 release. you can compile it with different (non-standard) options that change its behavior. the defaults were chosen for a reason and have been the same for quite some time. > How does telling me to do my own kernel compile including IPFW fix > this problem? your problem seems to be a dislike for the default settings. > This does not fix the problem for all the other users of the FBSD > software. what problem? > It has to be fixed at your end an made part of the next software > release. as you wish. -- - bill fumerola / fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org