Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:20:48 -0500
From:      Derrick Edwards <dantavious@comcast.net>
To:        Joshua Tinnin <krinklyfig@spymac.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SKYPE Sound Problems
Message-ID:  <200412172020.49193.dantavious@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <200412171240.15032.krinklyfig@spymac.com>
References:  <200411211341.10072.dantavious@comcast.net> <200412171222.02560.jtinnin@pacbell.net> <200412171240.15032.krinklyfig@spymac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 17 December 2004 03:40 pm, Joshua Tinnin wrote:

	Hey guys think I broke something. I rebooted machine and now when playing 
songs I am getting a slight lag in the artist voices. Not the very slowed 
down demon voice but still annoying:) Any ideas
v/r
Derrick




> Sorry, sent this from the wrong email account before; re-sending ...
>
> On Friday 17 December 2004 10:59 am, Michael Nottebrock
>
> <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Friday, 17. December 2004 19:45, I wrote:
> > > With that modification, run artsdsp esd and test some app that uses
> > > esound (like xmms with the esound output plugin enabled). fstat
> > > /dev/dsp* should only show artsdsp.
> >
> > N.B.: artsdsp esd -nobeeps -as 1 is probably better for real-world
> > usage, since this makes the wrapped esd release the device after 1
> > second of idle time, allowing artsd to to the same (if configured
> > that way). Oh yeah and -nobeeps is probably self-explaining 8-).
>
> Actually, I find that sysctl works fine with virtual channels. Is there
> any advantage one way or another? Seems to me like virtual channels is
> a bit more ... elegant, but I'm not sure if it would matter. Thanks for
> the patch either way, as it might come in handy, and it's always good
> to learn about more than one way to solve a problem.
>
> - jt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200412172020.49193.dantavious>