From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr  6 09:41:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA09074
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 09:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.think.com (Mail1.Think.COM [131.239.33.245])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA09069
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 09:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Early-Bird-1.Think.COM by mail.think.com; Sat, 6 Apr 96 12:41:26 -0500
Received: from compound (fergus-26.dialup.cfa.org) by Early-Bird.Think.COM; Sat, 6 Apr 96 12:41:22 EST
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound (8.6.12/8.6.112) id LAA09945; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 11:41:29 -0600
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 11:41:29 -0600
Message-Id: <199604061741.LAA09945@compound>
From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pgcc and kernels..
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


  From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
  Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 19:51:00 +1000

  gcc is always right.  

I take it this is axiomatic:)

  parts are mostly the old Intel work which was done long before that.
 
2.4.2.  The 2.7.2.9 pgcc seems to retain all the front-end features of
2.7.2, but fall down on back-end innovations of the past 3 years or so.

Anyhow, I just compiled those files with 2.6.3, foolhardy soul that I am. 

//alk