Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 03:16:23 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Subject: Re: I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right? Message-ID: <200403190316.29172.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040319015159.0B9C011E734@scifi.homeip.net> References: <200403122136.i2CLaCm9096276@repoman.freebsd.org> <p0602043abc7fca5da6c6@[128.113.24.47]> <20040319015159.0B9C011E734@scifi.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_9flWAQtN1EJF/UZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 19 March 2004 02:51, Paul Seniura wrote: > They are/were actually > considering publicly distributing kernels built with icc -- > something we are not privvy to use, as I understand the > license, and so must be clearly marked. I really think you read the license wrong there. The _binaries_ produced by= =20 ICC (commercially licensed, netchild@ says the project has a commercial=20 license) can be used by anyone - in fact, I'm pretty sure lots of your=20 collegues are using icc-compiled binaries on Windows systems right now. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_9flWAQtN1EJF/UZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAWlf9Xhc68WspdLARApzwAKCKqJpGdl9+y4CYtNUz1hDAWVlUEwCghQrl aZNdvNg6ExmSemu11atDqlA= =D0QS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_9flWAQtN1EJF/UZ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403190316.29172.michaelnottebrock>