Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 May 2000 17:14:20 -0700
From:      Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>
To:        "Richard Seaman, Jr." <dick@seaman.org>
Cc:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ivan_Debn=E1r?= <debnar@zoznam.sk>, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Native threads and SMP
Message-ID:  <20000503171420.H65569@sturm.canonware.com>
In-Reply-To: <20000502063602.B61185@seaman.org>; from dick@seaman.org on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 06:36:02AM -0500
References:  <LOBBJHLDGFMLDAHJJMEEGEGCCJAA.debnar@zoznam.sk> <20000502063602.B61185@seaman.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 06:36:02AM -0500, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 11:34:01AM +0200, Ivan Debnár wrote:
> > Is there a plan to support SMP in the native FreeBSD threads implementation ?
> 
> If Jason Evans is still working on it, then yes.  Otherwise, I'm not aware
> of anyone else working on it.

Actually, libc_r has just gotten to the point where I can mainly
concentrate on the new threads implementation, so I'm starting to work on
it now.

> > When using Linuxthreads from ports, trying to compile the aplications
> >(even provided examples) "static", it breaks with:
> 
> Yes, static linking has been broken for many months.  Jason Evans made some
> changes to siglongjmp and longjmp that broke static linking.  He was made 
> aware of the problem, but has (so far) chosen to ignore the problem. 

*That's* why I have those diffs in my source tree!  I think I have had
fixes for this for a long time, but I totally forgot there was a problem.
I'll look into it this week.

Jason


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000503171420.H65569>