From owner-cvs-ports Fri Jan 6 11:23:11 1995 Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id LAA26681 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Fri, 6 Jan 1995 11:23:11 -0800 Received: from post.demon.co.uk (post.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.72]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA26666; Fri, 6 Jan 1995 11:23:01 -0800 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id aa14302; 6 Jan 95 19:19 GMT Received: (from gary@localhost) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id TAA00510; Fri, 6 Jan 1995 19:10:15 GMT From: Gary Palmer Message-Id: <199501061910.TAA00510@palmer.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11 Makefile To: Satoshi Asami Date: Fri, 6 Jan 1995 19:10:14 +0000 (WET) Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199501060232.SAA10454@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jan 5, 95 06:32:44 pm X-OS: FreeBSD 2.1.0-Development X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 488 Sender: cvs-ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > asami 95/01/05 18:32:44 > Modified: x11 Makefile > Log: > Take out xv from SUBDIR list, it's a shareware. Eek. I just read what you have replied to. I think that xv can be safely left in, I can't remember a redistribution problem, and the last licence I saw said that private individuals can use it without charge, but corporations have to pay for a by-machine licence. Anyone know different. I think, although this may be shareware, it's safe to be left. Gary