From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Nov 13 14:11:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA26613
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 14:11:26 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA26607;
          Thu, 13 Nov 1997 14:11:16 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com)
Received: (from sef@localhost)
	by kithrup.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA25835;
	Thu, 13 Nov 1997 14:11:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sef)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 14:11:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>
Message-Id: <199711132211.OAA25835@kithrup.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: I would like to apologise
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

To both Jordan and David...

My last message (the one with the embarassing lack of subject, *blush*)
was a bit heated.

I do not like the lack of a workaround for FreeBSD, and I do not like
waiting until Intel decides to release information about it.  But,
really, I don't like Intel either, so, go figger ;).

I obviously do not agree with Jordan's attitude about this... but I do
understand his position.  (Barely, though, I have to admit that.)

And I don't doubt that either of them is doing what they think is right and
best for the freebsd users.

And, no, nobody yelled at me or threatened me about my message. :)

Sean.