From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Wed Mar 28 18:14:49 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C10F6EAA5 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.not-for.work (onlyone.not-for.work [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:6350::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915267B39C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.23.186] (unknown [89.113.128.32]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.not-for.work (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 824DCE63; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:14:47 +0300 (MSK) Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: smart(8) Call for Testing To: Rainer Duffner , Charles Sprickman Cc: Tom Evans via freebsd-fs , Chuck Tuffli References: <4754cb2f-76bb-a69b-0cf5-eff4d621eb29@callfortesting.org> <1d3f2cef-4c37-782e-7938-e0a2eebc8842@quip.cz> <7ED27465-1BC2-4522-873E-9ECE192EB7A2@ultra-secure.de> From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:14:46 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ED27465-1BC2-4522-873E-9ECE192EB7A2@ultra-secure.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:14:49 -0000 On 27.03.2018 22:13, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Maybe one of the vendors who sells FreeBSD as part of an appliance has shown some interest in this? > > If you’re hardware is well-defined and thus the output is consistent, I could imagine it’s not too difficult to parse this. smartd is very important part of smartmontools, smartctl is not so. And periodic self-test triggering & check is most important feature of smartd, IMHO. Modern HDDs are liers in SMART. And only regular self-test discover real errors on surfaces in my experience. So, tool without support for HDD self-tests is of little usage for appliances, IMHO. -- // Lev Serebryakov