From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 19:13:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485DA106564A for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D168FC1D for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-143-131.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.143.131]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1693CE73; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:13:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p1CJDIlR001523; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:13:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:13:18 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Frank Shute Message-Id: <20110212201318.3760ccfc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110212165419.GA55168@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <4D550415.8060105@ifdnrg.com> <20110211185738.GB45708@guilt.hydra> <4D56799D.13036.2335C99A@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <20110212165419.GA55168@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD and SSD drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:13:21 -0000 On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:54:19 +0000, Frank Shute wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:12:08PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Should I stop and buy a SATA disk?:) > > > > No you shouldn't but you should run FreeBSD on it ;) What else should one run?! ;-) > All I know is that I've been using one in my workstation for coming up > to a year with no problems so far. For noise issues, SSDs surely beat HDDs, but this will be compensated by all the fans in "modern" PCs for the power supply, the processor, the chip"set", the housing fan, the graphics card, the other graphics card... :-) > Take it from a mechanical engineer that SSDs are much more robust than > HDDs, which is one reason they (HDDs) are going the way of the dodo. At least in mobile devices (such as netbooks) they are welcome. Energy parameters seem to be okay, and the absence of moving parts is a big plus for this kind of devices where robustness is considered to be important. > I recommend that people should use SSDs for their workstations. No problem if a SSD fails after 2 years in use (just an arbitrary assumption), because of two reasons: (A) the computer itself will fail or at least considered outdated after that time, so it will get replaced, and (B) there are backups. Yes. There ARE backups. > Makes > a big difference in performance and makes the computer much more > pleasant to work on. Definitely, but consider my comment at the beginning. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...