From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 12:41:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 4B6DBB9D; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:41:36 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: svn commit: r358722 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20140623124136.GB11345@FreeBSD.org> References: <201406211708.s5LH8ZvE087036@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Mathieu Arnold , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:41:36 -0000 On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:17:19AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 21 June 2014 10:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > +# - This file's MAINTAINER is ports@FreeBSD.org so that entries can be added to > > +# it easily. Any sweeping changes should be approved by portmgr. > > IMHO this is silly. The risk of changing description text is almost > zero. Sweeping changes should be reviewed, but I don't think gating > the review on a member of portmgr is useful. +1. I recall I've spent some time on this file, polishing many of those descriptions. Running this through portmgr@ would have probably killed any desire to work on it. ./danfe