From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 12:45:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30E9E0A; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F7F23AB; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id cc10so4271028wib.6 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 05:45:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ebGuJTXwxvWfZJRTV+afEMq3LiS+p64dv4kAQSrjf5Q=; b=Q3mtATRSylDqslBabKYKPZkgbvxfP2xEDhvNHkWlv1RBd9Iw9opKIcGnJ5dx2uxkh+ 7LEUb2etKEXgzFAE+JWk/xdezYO5eqj9K5bnSRjZa4bGytZKeisGIuEeanB6wpqnhslB YXkoJgElZV6Cu7v+Kl3IBPQO1Lt3sIoTY7hex6sx8vrcrP+6WrABh+nILG83DYQ+3kdP GwpBGdZhyAPMiWb4N9PnLshWDTC8oVSJoN25SF4mWLBBADuL8NeFd4ngRS+d8g8dX4Gx QuOg3QvMPWefUurKsnVbPiU1aorcnLwg8K4kItSN7WyPDMp5R+XHWDGBRfsBmT+eO/RV PDbw== X-Received: by 10.194.62.140 with SMTP id y12mr27948685wjr.27.1403527537094; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 05:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id na4sm33096183wic.21.2014.06.23.05.45.35 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 05:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:45:33 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: svn commit: r358722 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20140623124533.GP23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201406211708.s5LH8ZvE087036@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Mathieu Arnold , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:45:40 -0000 --7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:17:19AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 21 June 2014 10:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > Author: mat > > Date: Sat Jun 21 17:08:34 2014 > > New Revision: 358722 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/358722 > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r358722/ > > > > Log: > > Add a small notice about maintainership of this file. > > > > With hat: portmgr > > Sponsored by: Absolight > > > > Modified: > > head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk > > > > Modified: head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > --- head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk Sat Jun 21 17:03:33 2014 (r35872= 1) > > +++ head/Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk Sat Jun 21 17:08:34 2014 (r35872= 2) > > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > > # - OPTION_DESC?=3D must be 19 characters or less > > # - OPTION description text must be 43 characters or less > > # > > +# - This file's MAINTAINER is ports@FreeBSD.org so that entries can be= added to > > +# it easily. Any sweeping changes should be approved by portmgr. >=20 > IMHO this is silly. The risk of changing description text is almost > zero. Sweeping changes should be reviewed, but I don't think gating > the review on a member of portmgr is useful. >=20 Given what happened recently on those yes portmgr needs to review those swe= ep regards, Bapt --7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOoIW0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyCrwCdGD3q1HaQ9BKRbb1YX1k2NgFP q6EAnjfKdnnJchnMsflv+5lNyxEqCkns =Jafa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7ZMy3ZKywLyoHonN--