From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 19 01:28:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F8A16A40F for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from regulus.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D5F43C9F for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:28:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by regulus.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBJ13RAw052094 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:03:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:03:26 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <4586ADC2.9030807@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <4586ADC2.9030807@networktest.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612181903.26955.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on regulus.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD as VM host OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 01:28:38 -0000 On Monday 18 December 2006 09:03, David Newman wrote: > This page compares various virtual machines: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_virtual_machines > > Unfortunately it appears very few support FreeBSD as a host OS. > > I would greatly appreciate advice, anecdotes, or cautionary tales of any > VMs that: > > - run on FreeBSD (amd64 or x86) as a host OS > > - run *nix guest OSs at or near native speed > > "You really need as the host OS" is a perfectly valid > response too. > > many thanks > > dn partially afraid of being flamed, but im sure most will understand, but when i recently downsized my operation into virtual machines on a single host, i chose linux with the free vmware-server. vmware offers any type of networking set up i need, as well as consoles over the web or applications (in linux or windows), and on top of that, vmware server has full sets of vmware-tools that will control freebsd guests perfectly (ie, when i call shutdown on the host, each guests shuts down properly as the host waits for each one). i have 5 (production) separate servers running as guests, and they run well enough that i cant really even tell they are virtual. i really think bang for the buck, linux/vmware is the way to go for a production level VM setup. cheers, jonathan