From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 14:35:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D94106566B; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theravensnest.org [109.169.23.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07D68FC0C; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc2-cwma5-0-0-cust875.7-3.cable.virginmedia.com [86.11.39.108]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAHEZ0q0063367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:35:00 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <20111117143149.GA96475@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:34:55 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201111151849.pAFInR3K012609@svn.freebsd.org> <20111116.232828.343708041526200614.nyan@FreeBSD.org> <4EC3D40A.5040204@freebsd.org> <1321457050.78238.10.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20111117124210.GB2051@garage.freebsd.pl> <1321535020.82271.5.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20111117143149.GA96475@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , Ken Smith , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro , Nathan Whitehorn , svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227536 - in head: release share/man/man7 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:35:03 -0000 On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>>> Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"? >>>=20 >>> Can't we use one if they are equal? >>=20 >> I'd prefer consistency. [...] >=20 > But it looks so plain stupid! I've had someone ask me what amd64-amd64 meant when I pointed them as = the RC announcement. I replied that I had no idea and suggested that = possibly RE had been handed over to the department of redundancy = department. Having read this thread, I can now confidently say... that = I still have no idea. But (with my compiler-writer hat on) please tell me that we're not = inventing yet another incompatible form of target triple. We have at = least twice as many as we need already... David=