From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 29 15:57: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ucsu.Colorado.EDU (ucsu.Colorado.EDU [128.138.129.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B086B14DB9 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:57:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doranj@ucsu.Colorado.EDU) Received: (from doranj@localhost) by ucsu.Colorado.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3/ITS-5.0/standard) id QAA13764 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:57:03 -0600 (MDT) From: Jonathon Doran Message-Id: <199906292257.QAA13764@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> Subject: Re: samba fs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:57:03 -0600 (MDT) In-Reply-To: <000a01bec281$603665a0$0200a8c0@win98> from "Mike Jakubik" at Jun 29, 99 06:47:27 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Please don't post HTML to the list... > > Are there any plans to create a way to = > mount=20 > windows samba nfs? like linux's sambafs. I have tried sharityd, but its = > not that=20 > great. The short answer: I hope not The long answer: It would help to know what you didn't like about Sharity, then perhaps it could get fixed. I haven't had any problems with it to speak of, so I can't guess at what you've experienced. If there was something you were having trouble accomplishing, perhaps we could offer some advice. I'm a bit troubled by the Linux philosophy of putting stuff in the kernel which should be left in user-land. Sharity shows that this function can exist in user-land, and so preserve some sanity in the kernel. Jon Doran NB: I was a bit amused as the discussion of placing Mozilla in the Linux kernel. Yes, now instead of restarting the browser, you can reboot your box. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message