Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Feb 2022 21:53:34 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 261798] lang/ghc: Fails to compile due to base/ports LLVM triple target names: error: Warning: Couldn't figure out LLVM version!
Message-ID:  <bug-261798-29464-5m5md4xW17@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-261798-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-261798-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261798

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needs-qa, regression
                 CC|                            |brooks@FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |dim@FreeBSD.org,
                   |                            |toolchain@FreeBSD.org
            Summary|lang/ghc: fix llvm code     |lang/ghc: Fails to compile
                   |generation                  |due to base/ports LLVM
                   |                            |triple target names: error:
                   |                            |Warning: Couldn't figure
                   |                            |out LLVM version!
             Status|New                         |Open
              Flags|                            |maintainer-feedback?(brooks
                   |                            |@FreeBSD.org),
                   |                            |maintainer-feedback?(dim@Fr
                   |                            |eeBSD.org),
                   |                            |merge-quarterly?

--- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
>From ghc patch:

  +-    "amd64-portbld-freebsd"
  ++    "x86_64-portbld-freebsd"

Is/was the triple name for base/ports LLVM's intended and expected and is t=
his
issue just that GHC hadn't yet followed, or is this something that's better
addressed in those ports at a toolchain/arch level with respect to how LLVM=
 is
built and presents itself?

^Triage: Loop in ports llvm (brooks) and base toolchain (dim)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261798-29464-5m5md4xW17>