From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 18 14:42:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03133 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 18 Aug 1998 14:42:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.kar.net (n189.cdialup.kar.net [195.178.130.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03005 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 1998 14:41:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kushn@mail.kar.net) Received: from localhost (volodya@localhost) by mail.kar.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA27863 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:40:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kushn@mail.kar.net) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:40:54 +0300 (EEST) From: Vladimir Kushnir X-Sender: volodya@kushnir.kiev.ua To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Why is MSF LKM marked broken? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Sorry if that's something obvious, but I'm really confused. What's wrong with using MSF LKM? It's marked as broken in sources and it's stated in handbook that MSF must be compiled into kernel. Meanwhile, I'm using it as LKM for almost a year (FreeBSD-current), and haven't seen anything wrong with it. Is my computer going to hit me over the head eventually for this abuse or is this module all right after all? Thanks for advice, Vladimir ===========================|======================= Vladimir Kushnir | kushn@mail.kar.net, | Powered by FreeBSD kushnir@ap3.bitp.kiev.ua | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message