Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:48:43 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Mike Makonnen <makonnen@pacbell.net>, Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: nik@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@elischer.org, gordon@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@Awfulhak.org, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rcNG rollout in -current Message-ID: <p05111781b933da6a20b0@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20020617021106.7aa4ef86.makonnen@pacbell.net> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206160957270.28471-100000@smtp.gnf.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0206161310030.10794-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20020616224017.A52976@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <3D0D0C4A.2B1B3102@FreeBSD.org> <20020617021106.7aa4ef86.makonnen@pacbell.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2:11 AM -0700 6/17/02, Mike Makonnen wrote: >On Sun, 16 Jun 2002 15:08:10 -0700 >Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: > > > Yes, the reasoning is that since the goal is to have the > > new stuff doing exactly what the old stuff does, there's > > no reason not to just get it over with. > >Yes, this is why I've been dissapointed with the dearth of >testers. I've tried to set it up so that when you switch on >rcng, nothing will break. For that we need lots of testers... Don't be too discouraged just yet. People don't necessarily track -current as frequently as they do -stable, or at least I don't. I have windows of time that I can work on freebsd, and if some change has broken current during that window then I have to skip it for another week. Between my own schedule and assorted temporary breakages in -current, I had gone more than a month without getting a successful buildworld. (I managed to get one last night) -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05111781b933da6a20b0>