From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 11:04:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7D017C for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.internetx.com (mx1.internetx.com [62.116.129.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177AD110 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.internetx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC6C4C4C8ED; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:55:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: InterNetX GmbH amavisd-new at ix-mailer.internetx.de Received: from mx1.internetx.com ([62.116.129.39]) by localhost (ix-mailer.internetx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oRXHmBwNsu+d; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.26] (pizza.internetx.de [62.116.129.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.internetx.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6083E4C4CCA2; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <542BDDB3.8080805@internetx.com> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:55:47 +0200 From: InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter Reply-To: jg@internetx.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JF-Bogaerts , freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HAST with broken HDD References: <542BC135.1070906@Skynet.be> In-Reply-To: <542BC135.1070906@Skynet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 11:04:39 -0000 Am 01.10.2014 um 10:54 schrieb JF-Bogaerts: > Hello, > I'm preparing a HA NAS solution using HAST. > I'm wondering what will happen if one of disks of the primary node will > fail or become erratic. > > Thx, > Jean-François Bogaerts nothing. if you are using zfs on top of hast zfs wont even take notice about the disk failure. as long as the write operation was sucessfull on one of the 2 nodes, hast doesnt notify the ontop layers about io errors. interesting concept, took me some time to deal with this. > __________________________________________________________________ > > Rue d'Orp 23 > 4280 Wansin > Belgium > Mob: +32 475 45 61 38 > mailto: [1]JF-Bogaerts@skynet.be > __________________________________________________________________ > > References > > 1. mailto:JF-Bogaerts@skynet.be > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >