From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 16 01:53:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0AC16A41C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jakemsr@jakemsr.com) Received: from mail231.csoft.net (resin.csoft.net [63.111.22.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4522443D1F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jakemsr@jakemsr.com) Received: (qmail 16553 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2005 01:53:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO puff.jakemsr.gom) (63.111.27.87) by mail231.csoft.net with SMTP; 16 Jun 2005 01:53:22 -0000 Received: (from jakemsr@jakemsr.com) by puff.jakemsr.gom (mini_sendmail/1.3.5 16nov2003); Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:53:19 PDT (sender jakemsr@puff.jakemsr.gom) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:53:19 -0700 From: Jacob Meuser To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050616015319.GD4057@puff.jakemsr.gom> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org References: <20050614135934.GHXT28809.lakermmtao07.cox.net@smtp.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050614135934.GHXT28809.lakermmtao07.cox.net@smtp.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: Re: Capturing video with Intel Smart Video Recorder III X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:53:21 -0000 On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:59:34AM -0400, dmwassman@cox.net wrote: > I rather get NuppelVideo working as it uses less CPU. I am using a old > computer (PII 400 w 256MB) to do this capture and am concerned with > the capture rate and quality. Again, I am completely new to this video > stuff, so if you think ffmpeg is better, I will give it a try. may I suggest trying bsdav -> http://www.jakemsr.com/bsdav/ _very_ light on CPU usage; fully documented. it does no encoding/ compression, so you will get the best possible picture. you will need a fair amount of disk space, though, unless you break the capture up into parts. I wouldn't imagine this being too much of a problem though, since you are capturing from a VCR. --