From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Mar  2 13:47:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA04869
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [204.160.242.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA04861
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:46:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harlie.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [204.160.242.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA25060; Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:46:00 -0800 (PST)
From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com>
To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
cc: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org,
        jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) 
In-Reply-To: <199703022136.NAA06629@rah.star-gate.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970302134236.27933A-100000@harlie.bfd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote:

> Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and get him
> the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8)

If you check the stats page, you'll notice he just changed his listing
from 606k keys/sec to 676k keys/sec, so he has the updated binary.  The
wonders of mime attachments :-)