From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 23:53:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EB91065670 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89338FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8HNrMEK039833; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:53:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8HNrMFM039832; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:53:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:53:22 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: "Sean C. Farley" Message-ID: <20090917235322.GM1212@albert.catwhisker.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Wolfskill , "Sean C. Farley" , current@freebsd.org References: <20090917134924.GZ1212@albert.catwhisker.org> <20090917170431.47be4a06@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090917152957.GA1212@albert.catwhisker.org> <20090917161519.GB1212@albert.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="991t1H9DIskWxVIu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/compat6x port no longer sufficient for DRI under head? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:53:23 -0000 --991t1H9DIskWxVIu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:37:46PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, David Wolfskill wrote: >=20 > >On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:32:09AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: > >>... > >>Have you tried re-enabling hald and dbus and configuring X to use=20 > >>those? > > > >No, I haven't. > > > >One of the reasons I stopped trying to use hald(8) was that when I=20 > >booted head, hald went into a 100% CPU busy loop. (Mind, this was=20 > >with hald built inder stable/6.) >=20 > How about building your system without HAL? I have been quite happy=20 > without it. As long as I have the following in my Xorg.conf, everything= =20 > (that I need) seems to be detected nicely: >=20 > Section "ServerLayout" > ... > Option "AllowEmptyInput" "off" > ... > EndSection Well, ref. the above "I stopped trying to use hald(8)" -- I did this by: Section "ServerFlags" Option "AutoAddDevices" "False" EndSection And then disabling the hald & dbus startup. It had been working in stable/6, stable/7, and head before the (apparently DRI-related) issues arose in stable/7 and (mnore recently) head. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --991t1H9DIskWxVIu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqyy/EACgkQmprOCmdXAD3beQCfTuU9Rn97ZUZiit09TDwFDSTj 49kAn35HBhLgiz28ipC9BgOpYZ5RKDa1 =H3WJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --991t1H9DIskWxVIu--