Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:19:59 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r218822 - in head: . contrib/binutils contrib/binutils/bfd contrib/binutils/bfd/doc contrib/binutils/bfd/po contrib/binutils/binutils contrib/binutils/binutils/doc contrib/binutils/binu... Message-ID: <20110220221959.GA56100@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110220220940.GP78089@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <201102182054.p1IKsDMx071986@svn.freebsd.org> <20110220220144.GA56015@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20110220220940.GP78089@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:09:40AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 02:01:44PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:54:13PM +0000, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > Author: dim > > > Date: Fri Feb 18 20:54:12 2011 > > > New Revision: 218822 > > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/218822 > > > > > > Log: > > > Merge binutils 2.17.50 to head. This brings a number of improvements to > > > x86 CPU support, better support for powerpc64, some new directives, and > > > many other things. Bump __FreeBSD_version, and add a note to UPDATING. > > > > > > Thanks to the many people that have helped to test this. > > > > This commit appears to be causing > > > > laptop:kargl[205] ~/work/bin/gfortran -o z a.f > > /usr/bin/ld: error in /usr/home/kargl/work/lib/gcc/i386-unknown-freebsd9.0/4.6.0/crtend.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created. > > > > > > Unfortunately, one can no longer run the GCC testsuite because > > the testsuite is not expecting the /usr/bin/ld message. > > > > So, is there an patch that needs to been sent upstream to GCC > > to fix crtend.o? Or. can you fix /usr/bin/ld to not emit this > > seemingly harmless message? > I suspect this is the same issue as was fixed by r209294 in FreeBSD > svn repo. Most likely, similar approach would help gcc. Thanks for the pointer to r209294. I'll see if I can fix gcc and submit a patch. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110220221959.GA56100>