From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:43:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DD0106566B; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387478FC0C; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werl4 with SMTP id l4so5327173wer.13 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:43:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=duhEarhHKkD2PuJmQDnbsTYps7koz+q2oQiYyTv5EwU=; b=lhYBlZ+XOM0zzuaJIgAx627apkYDNdriUv283dce1zjmijz7FyJ7hxy36n77oP+/pO 2eos24rRxxiHyhCqhUTdREK2luo3Z6a5EgEVT43d+CupU0ZQLQZ+AQTs6GhkRkOxZuUa VQI2cdw8BL3DcrSasbyJIig3uMRu5QO+Y6hVBo1ufw8u1yfoTGOqVDl7BRMfhAaHVknr x00DW4OxOw0DlLGGkujjDzenPQPbyCvI3cNmQUPfYoRT82ddGThKHmWJEDHR6SWnHw37 Lw3XA09hoVDehwLyaKS5OB4u11MEJiAUOpXVU8KqH8pQw26EYV+Eidr6rmOpDFcAhbRw lIrA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.131.2 with SMTP id l2mr1646647wei.3.1331149432182; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:43:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.198.81 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:43:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201203072017.44409.bschmidt@freebsd.org> References: <20120306.024212.108736612.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> <201203062005.15276.bschmidt@freebsd.org> <201203072017.44409.bschmidt@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:43:52 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GRFf6pCJKWU8bMKx1oRPpmFVKLw Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Bernhard Schmidt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mitsuru IWASAKI , freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patches for if_iwi and wlan for WEP mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:43:54 -0000 On 7 March 2012 11:17, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:12:55 Adrian Chadd wrote: >> .. except that the default if_transmit handling breaks fragments. Sigh. >> >> So we're going to have to implement if_transmit for all net80211 >> drivers soon and fix fragment handling. > > Not saying that you are wrong, it is unrelated to the issue at hand > though and I'm not even sure it can be fixed just by replacing > if_transmit(). Anyways, a bug going unnoticed for 3 years or something > isn't that high on my priority list. Oh, it's absolutely not a requirement here. It was more a comment that he didn't need to implement if_transmit just yet in order to fix this bug, but it's likely a good idea moving forward. I have recently acquired an iwi(4) NIC so I'll also test this out. Don't let me stop you though. :) Adrian