From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 15 09:47:13 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: doc@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C01A16A44F
	for <doc@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:47:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lothrandil@n00b.apagnu.se)
Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net
	(pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFE143D4C
	for <doc@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:47:12 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from lothrandil@n00b.apagnu.se)
Received: from [81.233.243.149] (81.233.243.149) by
	pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.072.1)
	id 446337DE000E4E38 for doc@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:47:11 +0200
Message-ID: <44684E01.5020504@n00b.apagnu.se>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:46:41 +0200
From: Niclas Zeising <lothrandil@n00b.apagnu.se>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: doc@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: close PR docs/66264
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:47:13 -0000

[Cleaning out gnats]
The pr docs/66264 , also found here: 
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=docs/66264 can be closed. The 
PR mentions a couple of spelling- and mdoc-fixes to the rtld(1) manual 
page. The changes have not been merged to RELENG_4, but are merged to 
RELENG_[5,6] and HEAD and since RELENG_4 is close to EOL I don't think 
it necessary to merge the changes. If somebody thinks different there is 
a patch in the PR with the changes.

Regards
Niclas