From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Feb 10 14:46:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B84B37B420; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:46:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E9D43FBD; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:46:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b121.otenet.gr [212.205.244.129]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1AMjplI022457; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:45:53 +0200 (EET) Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1AMjmIG096570; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:45:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h1ALW0gh011701; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:32:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:32:00 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Doug Barton Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/48095: Manual page for jail(8) does not mention mounting devfs under jail. Message-ID: <20030210213200.GD11444@gothmog.gr> References: <200302092050.h19KoEKx020142@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030209212448.X866@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030209212448.X866@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 2003-02-09 21:26, Doug Barton wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > # Jailed processes that need devices should have some sort of access > > # to /dev nodes when they are inside the jail, imho. It is then up to > > # the administrator to choose how to implement this. Either by > > # mounting devfs under the /jail/dev directory or by manually calling > > # MAKEDEV or mknod to create only those devices that are absolutely > > # necessary. > > MAKEDEV has gone the way of the dodo in -current, so it shouldn't be > mentioned. I have successfully created devices in a chroot environment > with mknod in -current, and they survive reboot. I haven't tried it with a > jail yet though. Ehm, I know, but I somehow forgot. We should only document devfs then. Thanks for reminding me that DEVFS is mandatory now. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message