From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 7 19:10:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122C1858 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 19:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (base.exwg.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80EACE0 for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 19:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820786003CE for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 21:10:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYZWIFiQSPah for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 21:10:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7b43:1:6a05:caff:fe01:aae9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 7 May 2013 21:10:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B745030E80; Tue, 7 May 2013 21:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 21:10:27 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: astro/gpsd fails to build on CURRENT Message-ID: <20130507191027.GB2066@elch.exwg.net> References: <51892984.4050301@gwdg.de> <20130507164745.GA2066@elch.exwg.net> <5189397D.7050300@gwdg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5189397D.7050300@gwdg.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 19:10:30 -0000 ## Rainer Hurling (rhurlin@gwdg.de): > I am wondering, if this could have something to do with the simultaneous > presence of libncurses in base system and ports? No, that's no problem. I'd blame scons and scons alone, as it tries to interpret the output of ncurses5-config, which is meant to be taken at face value. But then, I'm always suspicious of build utilities trying to be intelligent... Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space