From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 28 7:18:23 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9750B37B401 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd.org.ru (freebsd.org.ru [194.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E392B43FE1 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:18:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from osa@freebsd.org.ru) Received: by freebsd.org.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F05FD249; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:18:19 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:18:19 +0300 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: Igor Pokrovsky Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with getting through firewall using CVSup Message-ID: <20030228151819.GF424@freebsd.org.ru> Reply-To: osa@FreeBSD.org.ru References: <200302281442.h1SEg0RV042490@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <3E5F77B4.4392E9FD@cnrm.meteo.fr> <20030228151033.GE424@freebsd.org.ru> <3E5F7C82.9A9EA6CD@cnrm.meteo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E5F7C82.9A9EA6CD@cnrm.meteo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:13:06PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:52:36PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > > > Sergey Osokin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Is there any way to make it work? > > > > > > To fool firewall? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, looks like a bad/fool/stupid firewall administriva. > > > > > > > > I know, there are lots of companies that permit any inside > > > > initiated TCP connection. I'd call this stupid if not > > > > explicitly decided upon and documented. > > > Yes. I agree, maybe this is a good policy. And moreover > > > I think that they closed port 5999 on firewall because > > > of my activities :-) Perhaps they thought that I'm trying > > > do something, which will break their security. Maybe because > > > port number is not very popular :-) > > > > > > > And last - maybe they are running a strict application level > > > > gateway like Gauntlet or Sidewinder? If this is the case the > > > > admin must define a custom TCP proxy for CVSup, first. > > > No. Fortunatly. > > > > Last idea is use CTM. AFAIK your system administrator think > > that 25 port is much more popular for you and other users :-) > > It seems to me that yes. But can I get whole repository with CTM, > as I did with cvsup? Just look at ctm(1) and http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ctm.html -- Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEWS / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message