From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 24 13:41:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589AC37B401; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:41:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org) Received: from hornet.unixfreak.org (hornet [63.198.170.140]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B913E28; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:41:13 -0700 (PDT) To: Warner Losh Cc: John Baldwin , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "include" directive in config(8) (was: Two Junior Kernel Hacker tasks..) In-Reply-To: <200106242032.f5OKVwV91130@harmony.village.org>; from imp@harmony.village.org on "Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:31:58 -0600" Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:41:13 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010624204114.F2B913E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh writes: > Is there a way to "undef" an option? I thought about this, too. Right now there isn't a way to do that, and neither OpenBSD nor NetBSD have one AFAIK. That said, I think it would be trivial to implement. The list of options and devices is a simple linked list (mind you, it's a home-grown one, not queue(3)); it shouldn't be too hard to implement "unoption" and "undevice" directives. Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message