From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Tue Aug 30 16:40:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EDDBC8FF9; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7497DF19; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 522A5B953; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:40:09 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: "George V. Neville-Neil" Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305066 - head/tools/tools/crypto Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:34:03 -0700 Message-ID: <9289003.aPpUzvfJdT@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.3-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <201608301428.u7UESZKQ005906@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201608301428.u7UESZKQ005906@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:40:09 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:40:10 -0000 On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 02:28:35 PM George V. Neville-Neil wrote: > Author: gnn > Date: Tue Aug 30 14:28:35 2016 > New Revision: 305066 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/305066 > > Log: > Update cryptotest for modern algorithms > > Reviewed by: cem > Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC (Netgate) > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7598 Doesn't removing 'static' result in a bunch of warnings from clang now since you don't have function prototypes? Assuming these functions aren't meant to be exposed as a library to other programs, static is more correct. -- John Baldwin