From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  9 12:39:46 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B057416A402
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 May 2006 12:39:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from net@dino.sk)
Received: from mail.netlab.sk (mail.netlab.sk [213.215.72.51])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D555743D48
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 May 2006 12:39:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from net@dino.sk)
Received: from [84.245.65.229] ([84.245.65.229])
	(AUTH: PLAIN milan@netlab.sk, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
	by mail.netlab.sk with esmtp; Tue, 09 May 2006 14:44:16 +0200
	id 00289C0C.44608EA0.000120C3
From: Milan Obuch <net@dino.sk>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <5EB31780BD297F46812C8F495FA08F620438CAE3@electron.jnpr.net>
	<4460207A.9050505@elischer.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0605090544100.24955@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605090544100.24955@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605091439.26549.net@dino.sk>
Subject: Re: vrf support in FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 12:39:46 -0000

On Tuesday 09 May 2006 08:00, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> JE> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:54:18 -0700
> JE> From: Julian Elischer
>
> JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
>
> Ingress interface.
>

Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally 
originated/'destinated'.
Other than that, fully acceptable.

> Consider: 802.3ad, ECMP, FIB, multi RIBs (e.g., OSPF vs BGP weight), VRF
>
> I started working on all of the above late in 2003 on 4.x; the project
> was shelved due to lack of interest and [other parts of] $job taking
> priority.  I haven't looked at 5.x or 6.x code, but 4.x certainly would
> have benefited from an architectural overhaul.
>

Regards,
Milan