From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 20:12:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE9016A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:12:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEF843D5C for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:12:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7D38172DD8; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:12:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC2972DD5; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:12:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:12:25 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Paul Dlug In-Reply-To: <9975416e2ef6f29c2813c05c6612f749@aps.org> Message-ID: <20050219121207.X69556@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <9975416e2ef6f29c2813c05c6612f749@aps.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: re: 5.3 on IBM/Intel Blade server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:12:25 -0000 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Paul Dlug wrote: > Just a follow up to my message from the other week, it looks like we > are experiencing the same problem as described in this PR: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=68445 > > > Only the suggested "fix" in the PR doesn't work for me. Does anyone > have more information on this issue? The PR is still open. Is the suggested "fix" the patch that was applied to -current? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org