Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:48:15 +0200 From: Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Policy on removed ports Message-ID: <200905301648.15697.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, while scouting for calendar/collaboration servers and the lack thereof in the ports tree I started working on citadel. Then I wondered why this package has never been in ports and of course, it has been and removed because of a security vulnerability timeout. The specific issue has been fixed upstream, but what is the general policy on such ports? Will they never be allowed back in or are there guidelines/ case by case decisions? The port in question is known to MOVED as net/citadel. -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905301648.15697.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.ports>