From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 11 05:25:47 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA14859 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 05:25:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kot.ne.mediaone.net (kot.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.12.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA14852 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 05:25:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Received: (from mi@localhost) by kot.ne.mediaone.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id IAA25866; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 08:24:53 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <199902111324.IAA25866@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Subject: Re: umount -f In-Reply-To: <19990211144449.A45575@matti.ee> from Vallo Kallaste at "Feb 11, 1999 02:44:49 pm" To: vallo@matti.ee Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 08:24:52 -0500 (EST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" wrote: = => Nope: => => mi@xxx:/tmp (1044) umount -f -t nfs phosphorus:/phosphorus => umount: /phosphorus: Device busy => => It is not, that umount hangs, it is that it cares about the device being => busy despite `-f' flag. Or so it seems... send-pr? = =Do you have "hard" mount or "soft" mount? I have seen such behavior =for "hard" mounts. Soft. But it should not matter, should it? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message