From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 22:52:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C30769DD; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506EC1B00; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with SMTP id s85MnAvD052747; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:49:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:49:10 +0200 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:49:10 +0200 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: Robert Huff Subject: Re: package availability Message-ID: <20140905224910.GA52658@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <540A32AD.7080700@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540A32AD.7080700@rcn.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, bf@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:52:49 -0000 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Huff wrote: > I'm looking for a package of fftw3-3.3.3_2, built for amd64 with > default options. > "pkg search fftw3" reports 3.3.3_1. > When is 3.3.3_1 likely to become available? You probably meant: when is 3.3.3_2 likely to become available? That sounds like something you should ask the maintainer. I've CC'ed him/her. Also keep in mind that once a *port* has been updated it may take some days before new binary *packages* are built. AvW --=20 Imbibo, ergo sum. --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUCj3mAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8a/cP/0sJXaXK0SXXz/ZAizUDAHbW 7l6ODJpA0uhsCEh0gyyF5dpdR+NUl5zpY9ydgRVD9OPiNZ9loQC9mofbvgD55DHi nCA8+G6bnKQ0pxqVhOHjrYkkb9kTQTY/QUGOAyamEViuu+cDlKFKr/85nvEVcbEw Ab2MbXl3wuBs+11AoX76fruDwCQ4+1dmI83ebBTjXEsiD/Zn9bVTD9FLkzDPn7+k t34FFAVmabZnIx9RRsr/so5qgjhshXbOCkm9djbaMvBd0hRbyqhOlVlbmxeslmsI jf1jUnN1jxxL12yMCoOoZzGLrml3kQstkcYXssS88bRSP0Z3jjBZUQ535it4WLJm XQBu1/8+5Re/kPafy6r7yuLfY3kUl/qALNApzkWl7xglc4U+2YGoR48vIDxrt2NG YPi9d4RR9FBjXzEU4YwRe6NhrptR8LdxCtE9g2CivWY1t3KtgHzsdJyULvX+4FqW v5UAQPWXNnVC4X6tAom6OWWJ424NhoNMkwKIms8zqPiYUYI1tZYK+ns8w0GEzoqC jcoUjz7oZNZpyYIhm0kYJ6u5lWtoGQ4bigZTRt89KqpJT9l5XrXlk+JPjdjzGd5Q 1nYDPpLqUZITQBJdba+is2uJAyIDHJWWCKwhJvdkd7Ff83Kl3FV3p+DdbOQuW+kK FAefMcBj9IONVuWlgR2m =C5CY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--