From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 02:21:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1324316A420; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:21:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E5843D45; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:21:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4B21040E3; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:21:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:21:01 -0600 To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20060128022101.GB1757@soaustin.net> References: <43BCD937.1090108@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43BCD937.1090108@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd ports Subject: Re: Duplicate port names in MOVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:21:02 -0000 On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:30:47AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > This also leads to a question, are duplicate port names considered an > error, or is this something I should figure out how to parse, perhaps by > always taking the last entry? To close this topic for good, duplicate port names are now considered an error. mcl