From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 28 20:56:43 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4949916A418;
	Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com)
Received: from mail.lovett.com (foo.lovett.com [67.134.38.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171BB13C467;
	Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com)
Received: from inferno.canal.lovett.com ([172.16.32.23]:54243)
	by mail.lovett.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <ade@lovett.com>)
	id 1IEtL8-000O1a-6k; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:56:42 -0700
In-Reply-To: <46AB3831.60301@janh.de>
References: 46AB1480.6000602@janh.de <46AB3831.60301@janh.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <EA13A585-BC78-4B08-9492-8C4C4C273DB8@freebsd.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:56:41 -0700
To: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Sender: ade@lovett.com
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: failure: portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*'
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:56:43 -0000


On Jul 28, 2007, at 05:36 , Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> Was I wrong that in contrast to 259, in 261 there should not be a  
> '-' in front of the 3 ${BUILD_VERSION} in post-patch?

Nope, you weren't wrong.  It just happened to be a cosmetic fix, only  
addressing issues within the manpages themselves, rather than the  
functionality of the program.

Should be fixed now, thanks.

-aDe