From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 15 12:40:29 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 14A1937B401; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de
	[193.174.154.14])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9D6C743F75; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de)
Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])h6FJeMv05234;
	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:40:22 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:40:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
To: Thomas Moestl <t.moestl@tu-bs.de>
In-Reply-To: <20030715193518.GA1660@crow.dom2ip.de>
Message-ID: <20030715213656.A25192@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
References: <200307141153.h6EBrJKk045346@cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org>
	<xzp65m3vfw1.fsf@dwp.des.no><xzpy8yzty2m.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20030715193518.GA1660@crow.dom2ip.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
cc: sparc64@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Subject: Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:40:29 -0000

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Thomas Moestl wrote:

TM>On Tue, 2003/07/15 at 12:04:56 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
TM>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
TM>> > Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> writes:
TM>> > > It needs to be analyzed because cross-builds should not fail. Do
TM>> > > we have a machine problem? What exactly is dumping core? Is it
TM>> > > gzip or some binary started immediately after it? If it's gzip,
TM>> > > is there a relation with the recent compiler warning about strncmp?
TM>> >
TM>> > It's not a machine problem if it only happens to the sparc64 build -
TM>> > the same machine runs all the other -CURRENT tinderboxen except
TM>> > powerpc.
TM>>
TM>> It does not only happen to sparc64. I've seen it fail for all but
TM>> i386 and pc98, I think.
TM>
TM>i386 and pc98 have failed too (random example: July 5).

But sparc64 fails quite regularily when gziping man pages. The others are
more random.

Since about the same time I have dumping core make during make universe on
my i386. The core shows differnt signals (4, 10, even SIGILL), but always
in vfork().

harti
-- 
harti brandt,
http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org