From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jun 20  7: 0: 6 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4999337B549
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id HAA43349;
	Tue, 20 Jun 2000 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200006201400.HAA43349@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: insane@oneinsane.net (Ron Rosson)
Subject: Re: ports/19398: fetchmail lacks a dependency
Reply-To: insane@oneinsane.net (Ron Rosson)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/19398; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: insane@oneinsane.net (Ron Rosson)
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, duffner@fh-konstanz.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/19398: fetchmail lacks a dependency
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 06:51:46 -0700 (PDT)

 Actually instead of cluttering the ports tree with another port why 
 not just add a "if" statement to make the dependency for
 it. 
 
 Just my 2 cents.
 
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message