Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:30:14 -0500 From: Theron <theron.tarigo@gmail.com> To: Bob Eager <rde@tavi.co.uk>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: portmaster@BSDforge.com Subject: Re: When to use TMPPLIST instead of pkg-plist? Message-ID: <82e555d3-f75a-ecd3-e72a-4d0b63a8a40c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200229194440.70ad674e@raksha.tavi.co.uk> References: <a78ca75b-1596-ce0e-ccd5-f21210e16045@FreeBSD.org> <a38ed7c362f0e941a4e76616d9df599f@udns.ultimatedns.net> <20200229194440.70ad674e@raksha.tavi.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-02-29 14:44, Bob Eager wrote: > make makeplist > > I believe > Indeed. A port may also provide its own definition of makeplist (ideally preserving the /you/have/to/check/... nag) to make maintenance easier, but any changes to resulting pkg-plist can still be easily seen by version control. Is providing such helpers encouraged / discouraged as a policy? Theron
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?82e555d3-f75a-ecd3-e72a-4d0b63a8a40c>