Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:42:56 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Adriaan de Groot <zomer2018@weirdbump.com>, Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r485911 - in head/net-p2p/namecoin: . files Message-ID: <CADL2u4jtHsJRHU-Oq8Dupokize_vU6k6OY0x171pt=64w31T2w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20181126135909.GB50931@FreeBSD.org> References: <201811260204.wAQ24wC6035650@repo.freebsd.org> <9916419.mF7Y50I3LY@beastie.bionicmutton.org> <20181126135909.GB50931@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Op ma 26 nov. 2018 14:59 schreef Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:28:50AM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > On Monday, 26 November 2018 03:04:58 CET Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > > Also, switched to Qt5 because net/qt4-network is required by dependen= cy > > > however it fails to build with OpenSSL 1.1.1. FreeBSD base OpenSSL ha= s > > > been switched to 1.1.1 since FreeBSD 12. > > > > Thank you for switching. If any good comes from the long-term brokennes= s > > of qt4-network in the face of newer OpenSSL > > I've tried to fix it, but the patch was incomplete (consumers didn't link= ). > I need to revive it and commit again with the issues fixed. > > I certainly do not look forward to Qt4 deprecation; if kde@ would abandon > it I'd probably have to pick it up. > > I don't use KDE so I care less, but there are no reasons to Qt4 to go, it > works just fine. > Qt4 has been end of life since 2016, meaning no security bugfixes either. So after 3.5 additional years it is time for qt4 to go. Once again, the ports tree is not a museum. https://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/26/qt-4-8-7-released/ Ren=C3=A9
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADL2u4jtHsJRHU-Oq8Dupokize_vU6k6OY0x171pt=64w31T2w>