From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 17:32:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33F16A4EA for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:32:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9DE43D41 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:32:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i011WUN1005478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 02:32:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i011WQMO041606 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 02:32:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i011WQBE012869 for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 02:32:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i011WQg5012868 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 02:32:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 02:32:25 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040101013224.GC11668@cicely12.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de Subject: Still IRQ routing problems with bridged devices. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 01:32:45 -0000 The board is an old Asus T2P4 with 3 bridged cards and $PIR table. All IRQs behind bridges get bogusly IRQ4 instead of the right ones. Is this only a problem on some boards or do we have a general irq routing problem with bridges? At least I know that bridge irq routing works fine on alpha. $PIR table claims to only have 7 entries - does this make sense for a 4 slot board? If this is a board specific problem - can we at least add a loader variable to disable routing, so I don't have to patch the source on every update and can run a standart boot disk again? -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de