From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 31 21:25:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54E616A420 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:25:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru (gw.ipt.ru [80.253.10.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554BB43D53 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:25:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1EWh8U-000IXD-Md; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:24:10 +0300 To: Kirill Ponomarew References: <200510312006.j9VK6pRw034243@freefall.freebsd.org> <52412306@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20051031203555.GE36495@voodoo.bawue.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:24:10 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20051031203555.GE36495@voodoo.bawue.com> (Kirill Ponomarew's message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:35:55 +0100") Message-ID: <75618933@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/88291: [update] devel/smc: UNBREAK port (size mismatch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:25:31 -0000 On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:35:55 +0100 Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:27:57PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > The patch is trivial, but what is changed in tarball and why it was > > > rerolled 4 5 6 7 Can you provide this info 4 5 6 7 > > > > You see, I'm only reading the message at FreeBSD-ports@ list... > > ----- > > From: linimon@FreeBSD.org > > Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken > > ----- > > > > ... and trying to do my best to unbreak some of the ports. Hence, I > > don't use the port. Nevertheless I did all recommended steps to check > > that patch. > > > > If you say that the info you asked is vital, I'll try to get in touch > > with the developers. But according to > > > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=8964 > > > > the sources weren't touch since 2005-09-19 08:41. > > If tarball was rerolled, new features/bugs were added/removed, > hence, checksum is changed, committers/submitters should provide an > info about changed sources in tarball and describe it in the commit > message. I understand _that_. If the previous version was 4.2.1 then I'll say that a new version 4.2.2 is released, bugfixes ... and so on. But the version at the port system *is* already 4.2.2. It was changed at Tue Sep 20 01:03:36 2005 UTC (5 weeks, 6 days ago) by ijliao. The version at souceforge.net was released: "Posted By: cwrapp Date: 2005-09-19 08:56". This version fixed: "SMC generated incorrect C# code - failing to output the closing brace for try/finally blocks. This release corrects that error" a bug at 4.2.1. Nothing was rerolled after 4.2.2. I can't say why the size and checksum are mismatched fro the tarball. WBR -- bsam