From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 14:00:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56CAA739 for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.29.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1577EBBD for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.35.153.19] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Wi2As-0006xu-Ay for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 15:46:18 +0200 Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:46:11 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Obscure operating systems Message-ID: <20140507154611.26e32d62@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/Snx_iwZtJpeG41pT1uz.iKs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 14:00:14 -0000 --Sig_/Snx_iwZtJpeG41pT1uz.iKs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable velocidade da luz wrote: > Anyone here using PC-BSD, PureDarwin, GhostBSD, AnonymOS, (Amnesiac) Inco= gnito, eComStation, Syllable , ReactOS, Haiku, or MenuetOS? I'm planning o= n trying these, and would like to hear of users' experiences (good or bad).= Thanks. =20 I reviewed Anonym.OS in 2006 (in German): http://www.fabiankeil.de/blog-surrogat/2006/02/24/anonym-os.html Back then it worked as expected, but AFAIK there hasn't been a new release since, the packaged Tor version has known vulnerabilities and isn't expected to work with the current Tor network and thus I'd recommend you test Tails instead. It's actively maintained. I occasionally (try to) install PC-BSD for testing purposes and wouldn't recommend it. My last written review is from 2006 as well (and in German, too): http://www.fabiankeil.de/blog-surrogat/2006/01/10/pc-bsd-ueberzeugt-mich-ni= cht.html IIRC the last version I briefly tested a couple of weeks ago was based on FreeBSD 9.2. Obviously you should still test it for yourself, though. Fabian --Sig_/Snx_iwZtJpeG41pT1uz.iKs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlNqOSYACgkQBYqIVf93VJ0YqQCggrwkxnuncJghFmBEG+hOPm+A pCMAn1tKoEm7nv+DpzFRXQIKf+Yqprjm =TUPd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Snx_iwZtJpeG41pT1uz.iKs--