Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:52:50 -0700 From: secmgr <security@jim-liesl.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Nforce2 variant doesn't recognize SATA as SATA Message-ID: <42322142.3060200@jim-liesl.org> In-Reply-To: <200503112157.j2BLvChb029410@the-macgregors.org> References: <200503112157.j2BLvChb029410@the-macgregors.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rob MacGregor wrote: >On Friday, March 11, 2005 5:26 PM, secmgr <> unleashed the infinite monkeys and >produced: > > > >>Failing that, is there a definitive list of SATA PCI boards which >>FreeBSD does full support? >> >> > >See the release notes for the version of FreeBSD you're using. For 5.3 that's >http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/hardware-i386.html#DISK > > Well, thanks, but I looked there before I bought the board. 1. I challange you to derive from that page a list of supported PCI SATA adapters (and I don't mean RAID adapters like from highpoint or 3ware) 2. Even following the link to ata(4), what you get is a list of supported chips (some pata, some sata, not specifed as to which is which), NOT a list of supported boards. Within that was a reference that the Nforce II chipset WAS supported, which is why I bought what I did. Now you may say, "well, the mfg added to the chipset. Thats not FreeBSD's problem". Yes and no. The documentation isn't definitive as to what is supported. If the doc's had said "Nforce II PATA", then I would have questioned support of SATA before I purchased, but you can't tell that from the chip list. jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42322142.3060200>