From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Apr 4 1:21: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668B037B71F for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 01:21:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) Received: from sv.Go2France.com (ls1.meiway.com [212.73.210.33]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 4940216B1C for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 10:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010404101720.04db22a0@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: lconrad%Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 10:18:47 +0200 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: Re: Named Keep crashing. In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20010404173112.03d72a60@secombe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org yep, this is the kind of stuff I see reported in the ISC BIND lists. 9 not quite there, yet. Len ============ >I've tried the latest release Bind9 version on a Diablo news-feeder. >Diablo is using a nameserver a lot, that's why I installed Bind locally. >This machine has a load between 15-30, and the current datatransfer is >80Mbit/s outbound and 30Mbit/s inbound. > >After 2 days bind crashed, why is still unclear to me. After this incident >I downgraded to the latest Bind8 release which is running about 3 weeks >now without any problems. > >So far no Bind9 for me! http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training : In Austin, TX; SFO, CA; Paris, FR http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.3 "NT3" for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message