From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jul 19  0:49:34 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4691505A
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA71576;
	Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:48:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>,
	Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Determining the return address
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990717155538.14320Z-100000@cygnus.rush.net> <3792AE44.9CAC4953@softweyr.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 19 Jul 1999 09:48:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: Wes Peters's message of "Sun, 18 Jul 1999 22:49:08 -0600"
Message-ID: <xzpr9m5m65c.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> writes:
> On the SPARC, FWIW, the return address is in %i7.  What is difficult to
> determine (programmatically) is if the function is a normal or leaf function; 
> different return sequences are used for each.

It doesn't matter; all I need it for is to find the caller's name
using dladdr().

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message