Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:48:51 +0100 From: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> To: bsd <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: lpstat connection refused Message-ID: <20020122054851.GC2140@raggedclown.net> In-Reply-To: <p05101201b872aba3bc7d@[128.113.24.47]> References: <20020120172600.20898d27.erichey2@attbi.com> <p05101202b8727e6521ee@[128.113.24.47]> <20020122053033.GA2140@raggedclown.net> <p05101201b872aba3bc7d@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:42:17AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 6:30 AM +0100 1/22/02, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > >I have a suspicion, that KDE may sneak CUPs in while you are not > >looking. I installed a printer on a system this last evening with > >the latest KDE, and tried out the print manager thing in KDE. > >I have *not* conciously installed CUPS, but on the test page I printed > >from KDE stands in big letters at the bottom > > > >"Printed Using CUPS V1.1.x". > > > >And yes "lpstat" is there. > >However the print system I am using ex-KDE is the good old BSD one. > > > >Life is full of surprises. > > If you have an up-to-date ports tree, the CUPS port was just split > in two. KDE now uses the "safe" half, and now it shouldn't cause > any confusion with the standard BSD lpr-setup. Before the split, > installing KDE could confuse some printing issues. > I see, yes my ports tree is up to date as of about 24 hours ago. No problems, seemed to work just fine within and without KDE. -- Regards Cliff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020122054851.GC2140>