From owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Thu Feb 16 12:00:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A14CE2AA6 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:00:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B35461ED7 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.15] ([194.32.164.15]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v1GBmuF6005416; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:48:56 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Server performance & enhancement From: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:49:03 +0000 Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Karl Denninger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:00:55 -0000 Hi, > On 16 Feb 2017, at 11:20, Karl Denninger wrote: >=20 > I'm wondering what people think of a forward path for the following: >=20 >=20 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (2400.14-MHz > K8-class CPU) > Origin=3D"GenuineIntel" Id=3D0x206c2 Family=3D0x6 Model=3D0x2c = Stepping=3D2 >=20 > = Features=3D0xbfebfbff >=20 > = Features2=3D0x29ee3ff > AMD Features=3D0x2c100800 > AMD Features2=3D0x1 > VT-x: PAT,HLT,MTF,PAUSE,EPT,UG,VPID > TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics > real memory =3D 25773998080 (24580 MB) > avail memory =3D 24915828736 (23761 MB) > Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600 > ACPI APIC Table: <111612 APIC1749> > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 16 CPUs > FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 hardware threads >=20 > The system board is a Supermicro and has embedded IPMI (which I = require > for remote admin purposes) on a separate interface. It's plenty fast > but very power-hungry. >=20 > I'm interested in other's experience with various system board = options, > and processors, that will return /better /performance and which have a > good history running FreeBSD /but with lower power consumption. >=20 > /Any suggestions welcome. We=E2=80=99ve had good experiences with Intel=E2=80=99s own servers = based on the S2600Gx m=E2=80=99boards but might be overkill for you. > --=20 > Karl Denninger > karl@denninger.net > /The Market Ticker/ > /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk