Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 22:35:04 +0200 From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another problem with the new CAM error handling Message-ID: <20010509223504.I12728@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <20010509130459.A17074@panzer.kdm.org>; from ken@kdm.org on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:04:59PM -0600 References: <20010426110542.A50185@uriah.heep.sax.de> <200104261435.f3QEZLs23573@aslan.scsiguy.com> <20010426190714.E50185@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20010428231227.A37369@panzer.kdm.org> <200105060912.f469CnU07813@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20010506115718.B94763@panzer.kdm.org> <200105070451.f474pfN11471@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20010507171142.A3692@panzer.kdm.org> <20010509204919.H12728@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20010509130459.A17074@panzer.kdm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > Should/could we add a quirk for the scanner that synthesizes an > > ASC/ASCQ of 29,0 in that case? Here's the inquiry data: > > I'm not sure it would really be worth it. We don't have the quirk > framework at the moment to synthesize ASC/ASCQs from sense keys anyway. OK, may it rest in peace then. ;-) Thanks for the help, Ken, to clarify the reason! -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010509223504.I12728>