Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:30:58 +0100 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Andy Farkas <andyf@speednet.com.au> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: NTPD in upcoming release? Message-ID: <20010810103058.A73263@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0108101202170.6467-100000@backup.af.speednet.com.au>; from andyf@speednet.com.au on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:05:56PM %2B1000 References: <20010809184004.B19892@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0108101202170.6467-100000@backup.af.speednet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:05:56PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: > We are in code 'slush' mode - the freeze doesn't happen until the 15th. > > BIND, binutils, file, and groff have all been updated during the slush, > why not ntpd. Code usually spends some time in -current before being merged to -stable, the aim being to iron out the worst of any problems which might arise. Ntpd hasn't yet been imported into -current, so it's unlikely it will make it into -stable. The new version of ntpd also uses OpenSSL for crypto stuff, so something has still to be figured out for people who can't use OpenSSL for some reason. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010810103058.A73263>